Helen Pluckrose is our keynote speaker at Summit 2026. Helen is an independent author and journalist living in London, England, For the past decade Helen has been publishing and leading programs and initiatives that challenge authoritarianism and illiberal actions - both on the right and on the left.
To help us get to know Helen, we have been highlighting one of her blog posts from https://www.hpluckrose.com/ each month in the Compass.
This month we are highlighting two blog posts, since both address issues near and dear to many at NAUA. The first, "Specific Skepticism: How the Enlightenment Learned to Doubt Without Giving Up on Truth" traces the history of traditional liberalism, the problems it addressed, and modern trends toward pre or post-liberalism that risk scientific progress and individual freedom. This is a very worthwhile read for anyone who believes in the NAUA values of freedom, reason, tolerance and the inherent worth and dignity of all persons.
The second post, "The Difference Between Truth Claims and Principles," highlights how empirically proven scientific truths are different from CRT principles that question even the existence of truth.
"Truth claims and principles are categorically different things. Truth claims cannot soften into principles, nor can principles harden into truth claims. They answer different kinds of questions. People may hold the same truth claim while applying very different principles to it, or share the same principles while disagreeing profoundly about what is true.
"It is entirely possible to believe that gender identity is more authoritative than biological sex and still object to a woman losing her job for holding the opposite view. A liberal would oppose anyone being dismissed simply for expressing either belief, regardless of which, if any, they personally held. [In another example] people have been insisting that their own religious beliefs are true and arguing over them for millennia. Defending everyone’s right to believe what they wish and live accordingly, free from discrimination or harassment, while insisting that they not harm others or coerce them into affirming those beliefs, is a much more compelling proposition.
"Never underestimate the importance of the liberal principles that keep debate open and allow that truth to prevail." |